|             Footnotes: (1) 
          Markrich, 
          Mike. The crumbling of our public schools. Honolulu Advertiser. 
          October 8, 2000. Focus Section.   (2) 
          See 1998 State 
          Data Book, Table 3.09 and the 1991 State Data Book, Table 82 and 
          Historical Statistics of Hawaii, Table 9.3. (3) 
          Pers. comm. HAIS staff. People views of private school costs are strongly 
          influenced by Punahou and Iolani. These are the most expensive schools 
          averaging $10,000 annually but these two account for only 12% of the 
          state’s 36,702 private school students. (See the HAIS website for individual 
          school tuition and enrollment and the 1998 State Data Book 
          for total private school students.)         (4) 
          See Historical Statistics of Hawaii, pp. 641-2.   (5) 
          See Historical Statistics of Hawaii, p. 642. (6) 
          See http://www.lava.net/cslater/HEDSTATS.gif 
          Column 14.     (7) See http://www.lava.net/cslater/HEDSTATS.gif  
          Column 12. (8) 
          As of 1997 special ed. teachers were 13% of Hawaii’s 11,500 public school 
          teachers. For 7% less students, there were only 7,700 teachers in 1975. 
          See http://www.lava.net/cslater/HEDSTATS.gif   (9) http://www.hgea.org/  
          (click on endorsement postcards) |  A 
          crumbling of school factsDon't 
          blame private-school enrollment or state spendingfor the decline in public education. Blame the unions.
Mike Markrich sheds 
          valuable light on the difficulties public school teachers face in his  
          “The crumbling of our public schools” (10/8). However, some of his conclusions 
          are incorrect.  He tells us that 
          the upper and middle classes have largely abandoned public education 
          in Hawaii and that their offspring have the best of everything in exclusive 
          private schools while the majority of schoolchildren study in crowded, 
          largely under maintained public school buildings. (1) However, for nearly 
          the last 100 years private school enrollment in Hawaii has varied between 
          15% and 18% and is currently 16.3% according to the State Data Book 
          and historical statistics. (2) There has been no abandonment. And aside from 
          such schools as Punahou and Iolani, private schools are generally far 
          less costly than public ones. The Hawaii Association of Independent 
          Schools calculates that the statewide average private school tuition 
          paid is $6,130 per student. (3) We should dwell 
          awhile on the idea that these private school students can have the best 
          of everything for $6,130 per student while the rest study in crowded, 
          largely under maintained public schools for $6,300 per student. Hmmm. He also finds that 
          former Governor Jack Burns was so supportive of education that in 1970 
          it was 50 percent of the state budget. But after Burns died in 1975, 
          there was no longer a Democratic Party leader willing to put education 
          first. He concludes that by the 1990s public education reached rock 
          bottom because public education had sunk to an indifferent 31% of the 
          overall budget. From this he concludes that we need much more money 
          spent on education.  However, only 37% 
          of Gov. Burns’ 1970 budget was spent education—not 50%. And while this 
          has subsequently declined to 28% it is an error to conclude from this 
          that education is under funded. (4) What has happened is that the rest 
          of State government spending has bloated even faster than it has for 
          education.  Public K-12 education 
          spending has increased from $134 million in 1970 to over $1.2 billion 
          today—for just 8% more students. (5) But the key statistic is what we 
          have spent per student after allowing for inflation. It was $3,300 
          in 1970 and by 1995 had increased by 73% to $5,760. (6)  So rather than 
          blaming those governors after Burns as being unwilling to spend on education 
          we have to find something else to blame.  The biggest gains 
          in teacher salaries were during what our high school textbooks refer 
          to as The Oligarchy. Between 1920 and 1955 teacher salaries increased 
          300% even allowing for inflation. Compare that with the 15% decline 
          since teachers were unionized and gained collective bargaining power.(7) 
           So—how could we 
          be spending 73% more per student yet pay teachers 15% less? By bloating 
          up on more staff and more bureaucrats (special-ed teachers are only 
          a small part of it). (8)  This has happened 
          because public worker union leaders are more interested in gaining members 
          than they are in what those members earn or how qualified they are. 
          More members mean more dues. More dues mean higher salaries for union 
          leaders. This is what has stopped any real reform of public education 
          including any real charter schools.  And as long as 
          parents keep electing legislators endorsed by these union leaders nothing 
          will change. (9) Cliff 
          Slater is a regular columnist whose footnoted columns are at www.lava.net/cslater |